The automated battlefield

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  27 Apr 2018:
Vol. 360, Issue 6387, pp. 386
DOI: 10.1126/science.aas9074

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

  • Frankenstein metaphor indicates our future?

    George Lucas introduced a current metaphor in Frankenstein for examining autonomous weapons and the future of war (1). Frankenstein is a human-made artificial creature. The nature of Frankenstein whether he will be embedded with the good-will or bad-mind is determined by the technology user. Frankenstein’s food implies genetically modified organisms (GMO) (2). The nature of Frankenstein is really depending on the technology user’s ethics and/or moral (3). It means that determining the nature of Frankenstein is beyond our control (3). The nature of weapons with embedded artificial intelligence (AI) is also beyond our control. It needs to be taken on faith that the autonomous weapons are embedded with good-will AI. It is hard to believe that all weapons are embedded with good-will AI. Who orders designers to determine the nature of Frankenstein? Ethical scientists and engineers should take an initiative in examining AI weapons.

    1. George Lucas, The automated battlefield, Science 27 Apr 2018: Vol. 360, Issue 6387, pp. 386
    3. Y. Takefuji,

    Competing Interests: None declared.

Stay Connected to Science