Policy ForumScience Education

Disparities in science literacy

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  25 May 2018:
Vol. 360, Issue 6391, pp. 861-862
DOI: 10.1126/science.aar8480

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

  • Science literacy may be depending not on races but on annual income

    Nick Allum et al. wrote an article entitled “Disparities in science literacy” (1). Japanese ministry of education has studied the relationship between mathematical skills (6th grade of elementary school) and annual income (2). The result shows that poor family kids (less than 2 million yen per year) favor a family subject over mathematics while rich family kids (more than 10 million yen per year) favor arithmetic over family subjects. The family subject in Japanese classes is a subject that aims to acquire views, knowledge and skills necessary for family life. Another Japanese study shows that mathematics/reading skills in the 6th grade are proportional to annual income of the family (3). Based on Japanese studies on children literacy, there is no significant difference between adults (1) and children. In other words, the richer, adults/children have the higher scores in mathematics than the poor. Science literacy may be depending not on races but on annual income.

    1. Nick Allum et al., “Disparities in science literacy” Science 25 May 2018: Vol. 360, Issue 6391, pp. 861-862
    2. http://tmaita77.blogspot.com/2016/06/blog-post_7.html
    3. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/html/hpab200901/detail/1296707.htm

    Competing Interests: None declared.

Stay Connected to Science