Exploring early human embryo development

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  08 Jun 2018:
Vol. 360, Issue 6393, pp. 1075-1076
DOI: 10.1126/science.aas9302

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • Entangled Mortality: A Biological Parrondo’s Paradox
    • Kang Hao Cheong, Assistant Professor, Singapore Institute of Technology
    • Other Contributors:
      • Jin Ming Koh, Singapore Institute of Technology
      • Michael C. Jones, PO Box 432, Ashland, Missouri, USA 65010

    Kang Hao Cheong 1*, Jin Ming Koh 1, and Michael C. Jones 2
    1 Engineering Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, 10 Dover Drive, S138683, Singapore.
    2 PO Box 432, Ashland, Missouri, USA 65010.
    *Corresponding author. Email: (K.H.C.)

    Recently, Rossant and Tam (1) discussed early human embryo development; and Dance (2) reviewed bioethical and technical concerns on editing the human genome, creating "designer babies" and extending lifespans. We point out a fundamental biological caution.

    Patterns of natural senescence reflect eco-evolutionary life cycle optimization across taxa. Organisms such as mayflies and salmon exhibit rapid synchronous breeding, senescence and death, whereas humans are slow and asynchronous. Diversified multimodal patterns of proximal mortality causes, such as cancer, heart disease, and dementia, underpin our protracted senescence; such asynchrony may befit our overall life history trait adaptations to extremely stochastic environments.

    We recently argued that life cycle evolution can be modelled as an optimization problem within the game-theoretic framework of Parrondo's paradox (3), in which individually losing strategies combine to create emergent winning outcomes. In this model, aging and death of individuals are necessary for lineage survival and are shaped by continuous directional selection to opti...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.