New NSF policy will stifle innovation

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  19 Oct 2018:
Vol. 362, Issue 6412, pp. 297-298
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav4793

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

  • New NSF policy on limiting PIs to a single proposal per fiscal year makes sense

    Heather L. Eisthen et al. wrote an article entitled “New NSF policy will stifle innovation” (1). The new NSF policy on limiting PIs to a single proposal per fiscal year causes biological research (1). From the past, we have learned several lessons from the large government investments to supercomputers around 1990 (2) and biotechnology (3). Instead of the special large government support to the specific research areas, the fund should be shared with many researchers (4). The new NSF policy can support sharing with many researchers. If the proposed researches are attractive, the researchers should seek for the support from industry and/or from alternative finance (5). The government role in research funding has been changing.

    1. Heather L. Eisthen et al., New NSF policy will stifle innovation, Science 19 Oct 2018: Vol. 362, Issue 6412, pp. 297-298
    2. John Markoff, Thinking Machines To File for Bankruptcy, The New York Times August 16, 1994
    3. Sascha Karberg, Biotech's Perfect Storm, Cell Volume 138, Issue 3, p413–415, 7 August 2009
    4. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6334/123/tab-e-letters
    5. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6402/538/tab-e-letters

    Competing Interests: None declared.

Stay Connected to Science