EDITORIAL

How to clean up the Ganges?

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  02 Nov 2018:
Vol. 362, Issue 6414, pp. 503
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav8261

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

  • RE: Ganga clean-up: Smaller scale strategies are preferred
    • Abhik Gupta, University professor, Department of Ecology & Environmental Science, Assam University, India
    • Other Contributors:
      • Ben J Kefford, University associate professor, Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Australia

    In this editorial, Shah et al. have revived the "Ganges water machine" (GWM) concept put forward in the 1970’s (1), and advocated for recently (e.g. 2). Essentially, this strategy involves intensive winter and pre-monsoon drawing down of groundwater which are then refilled by monsoon rains, floodwaters and snowmelt. The GWM is designed to increase dependence on groundwater so as to leave more surface water for maintaining environmental flow to flush pollutants from the river. However, this prescription needs to be examined carefully from several standpoints before adoption. Firstly, six of the seven sub-basins where the GWM was assessed to have high efficacy (3) have high arsenic concentrations, and groundwater irrigation has already resulted in widespread As contamination of soil, vegetables, rice, and other crops (4). Secondly, groundwater use for irrigation already accounts for 67% of irrigation water within the Ganges Basin (5). It is not certain how pushing it further would significantly control flood and increase lean-season flow. Thirdly, land subsidence due to intensive pumping may occur in places (2). Instead of going for spectacular action plans, it may be more prudent to implement smaller scale strategies including improvement of discharge water quality and generating mass awareness among riparian communities to adopt eco-friendly practices – with the help of religious and cultural leaders - throughout the Ganges basin.
    REFERENCES
    1. R. Ra...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Stay Connected to Science

Navigate This Article