Controlled crack propagation for atomic precision handling of wafer-scale two-dimensional materials

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  09 Nov 2018:
Vol. 362, Issue 6415, pp. 665-670
DOI: 10.1126/science.aat8126

Cleaving with a metal handle

Using adhesive tape to pull off monolayers of two-dimensional (2D) materials is now a well-established approach. However, the flakes tend to be micrometer scale, and the creation of multilayer stacks for device application can be challenging and time consuming. Shim et al. show that monolayers of a variety of 2D materials, including molybdenum disulfide and hexagonal boron nitride, can be cleaved from multilayers grown as 5-centimeter-diameter wafers. The multilayer is capped with a nickel layer, which can be used to pull off the entire grown stack. The bottom of the stack is again capped with nickel, and a second round of cleaving leaves the monolayer on the bottom nickel layer. The monolayers could be transferred to other surfaces, which allowed the authors to make field-effect transistors with high charge-carrier mobilities.

Science, this issue p. 665


Although flakes of two-dimensional (2D) heterostructures at the micrometer scale can be formed with adhesive-tape exfoliation methods, isolation of 2D flakes into monolayers is extremely time consuming because it is a trial-and-error process. Controlling the number of 2D layers through direct growth also presents difficulty because of the high nucleation barrier on 2D materials. We demonstrate a layer-resolved 2D material splitting technique that permits high-throughput production of multiple monolayers of wafer-scale (5-centimeter diameter) 2D materials by splitting single stacks of thick 2D materials grown on a single wafer. Wafer-scale uniformity of hexagonal boron nitride, tungsten disulfide, tungsten diselenide, molybdenum disulfide, and molybdenum diselenide monolayers was verified by photoluminescence response and by substantial retention of electronic conductivity. We fabricated wafer-scale van der Waals heterostructures, including field-effect transistors, with single-atom thickness resolution.

Because of their in-plane stability and weak out-of-plane interaction, two-dimensional (2D) materials can be stacked together to form a multitude of device types with a broad spectrum of functionalities (16). Construction of 2D material–based heterostructures is often described as stacking Lego blocks (4). To tailor the 2D heterostructure characteristics for specific functionalities, it is essential to isolate 2D materials into monolayer films and stack them with monolayer precision. The most common method for assembling these 2D blocks is by using the adhesive-tape method (7), with which stacking of micrometer-scale flakes has been demonstrated (4). However, this method cannot reliably produce monolayer 2D crystals from bulk materials. The process becomes more complicated if the heterostructure design requires several different types of 2D material monolayers. Multiple monolayer flakes must be initially secured for each 2D material, which becomes extremely time consuming. Moreover, although the isolation of flakes into a nominal monolayer has been demonstrated, the lateral dimensions (hundreds of micrometers) are not sufficient to guarantee the fabrication of large-scale 2D heterostructures (8). In parallel, numerous efforts have been made to directly grow 2D heterostructures at the wafer scale (6, 9, 10). Recently, metal-organic chemical vapor deposition growths of wafer-scale monolayer 2D materials and their heterostructures have been successfully demonstrated for some transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) at a specific growth condition (11, 12).

We introduce a layer-resolved splitting (LRS) technique that can be universally applied to produce 2D material monolayers at the wafer scale. This method requires one short growth of thick 2D materials on the wafer at a relaxed growth condition and subsequently harvests the multilayers to individual monolayers through a wafer-scale splitting process. This method allows for high-throughput production of monolayer 2D materials with single-atom thickness precision for the fabrication of wafer-scale van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures. We demonstrated the wafer-scale LRS for various monolayers of 2D materials, including hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), tungsten disulfide (WS2), tungsten diselenide (WSe2), molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), and molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2). These films are readily stackable for forming wafer-scale 2D heterostructures. We have revealed the underlying mechanics that allows precise control of crack propagation, enabling LRS of the 2D material multilayers into multiple individual monolayers. The wafer-scale monolayer of TMDCs after LRS exhibits substantial photoluminescence (PL) enhancement uniformly across a 5-cm wafer at a photon energy corresponding to its monolayer. Through this digital control of monolayer 2D materials, we demonstrate wafer-scale vdW heterostructures with single-atom thickness resolution. The heterostructure devices prepared by LRS and a quasi-dry stacking process exhibited substantial improvement in electrical and optical uniformity across the wafer. This finding will open up new opportunities for the 2D material research community, as it provides a reliable pathway to form wafer-scale 2D heterostructures with monolayer resolution.

The schematic of the LRS process (Fig. 1A) shows a thick 2D material with an arbitrary number of layers grown on sapphire. Because of the difficulty in controlling the nucleation of the 2D material, new nucleation sites inevitably appear on top of the initial nucleation layer on the wafer before full substrate coverage. Thus, growths of multilayer 2D materials result in irregular, discontinuous films at the top but leave uniform, continuous films underneath. Once the entire multilayer film is removed from the sapphire wafer, the continuous 2D material films on the bottom can be split into many monolayers with the LRS process. We designed the LRS process on the basis of differences in the interfacial toughness (Γ) of these materials. We used a 600-nm-thick nickel (Ni) film as an atomic-scale adhesive because the reported Γ between 2D materials and Ni (Γ2D-Ni ~ 1.4 J m−2) (13) is three times that of the vdW interface between layers in 2D materials (Γ2D-2D = 0.45 J m−2) (14). The Γ between 2D materials and sapphire (Γ2D-Sapphire) has been empirically deduced (see supplementary materials and methods), and its average value (Γ2D-Sapphire = 0.26 J m−2) is less than Γ2D-2D. Application of a bending moment during the liftoff of a Ni/2D material stack on sapphire supplies elastic strain energy to the bottom interfaces (Fig. 1B). The strain energy per unit area is released upon delamination when the desired strain release rate (G) is reached. As shown in Fig. 1C, an external force creates a bending moment, resulting in a torque applied across a small distance in the sample that initiates spalling mode fracture where the cracks propagate downward due to mixed mode I and mode II fracture (15). 2D materials grown at the edge of the wafer are typically defective so that the crack propagation can be facilitated. Spalling mode fracture occurs as a result of the external bending moment applied. In addition to the opening mode stress (mode I) acting on the crack tip, a shear field (mode II) is created to guide the cracks into the bulk. Thus, exfoliation of Ni/2D material stacks can separate the 2D-sapphire interface that has the weakest interfacial toughness and allow clean separation of 2D materials from the wafer.

Fig. 1 Layer-resolved splitting (LRS) of 2D materials.

(A) Schematic illustration explaining the LRS process for 2D materials. ML, monolayer. (B) Modeling of energy release rate according to applied moment. (Ni thickness: 600 nm). Γ, interfacial toughness. (C) Schematics of crack progression during LRS for initial exfoliation of entire 2D materials from sapphire wafer (left) and exfoliation of the bottom monolayer 2D material (right). (D) Raman intensity mapping at the E12g peak (353 cm−1) of WS2 grown on a sapphire substrate, with laser wavelength and power of 532 nm and 2 mW in continuous waveform, respectively, where the spatial resolution is 2 μm. a.u., arbitrary units. (E) AFM topology taken from the top of as-grown 4-nm-thick WS2 on the sapphire wafer. (F) Raman mapping image showing the intensity of the E12g peak (353 cm−1) on sapphire substrate after exfoliation of the WS2 layer, with laser wavelength and power of 532 nm and 2 mW, respectively. (G) AFM topology taken from the bottom of WS2 layer after exfoliation. Scale bars for Raman mapping images and AFM topology images are 2 μm and 50 nm, respectively.

We first applied the LRS technique to 4-nm-thick WS2 grown on a sapphire wafer through vapor phase epitaxy, characterizing each step of the process. As shown in the Raman mapping of as-grown WS2 on the sapphire wafer, the E12g peak of the WS2 indicates that the sapphire wafer is fully covered with WS2 after the growth (Fig. 1D and fig. S1). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) topology taken from the top of the as-grown WS2 (Fig. 1E) shows that a rough discontinuous surface morphology developed from uncontrollable nucleation during growth, which is typically observed for the as-grown 2D materials. The LRS process was initiated with an exfoliation step to remove the entire WS2 stack from the sapphire wafer. A second exfoliation step isolated them into monolayer films. For the first exfoliation, a 600-nm-thick Ni film was deposited on multilayer WS2, followed by application of thermal release tape on the Ni as a handler. Lifting off the tape/Ni stack successfully separated the weakest WS2-sapphire interface, resulting in release of the entire WS2 film from the substrate; no sign of WS2 was detected from Raman mapping and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy on the sapphire wafer after exfoliation (Fig. 1F and figs. S2 and S3). Thus, a moment applied by liftoff supplies the Ni/WS2 stacks with strain energy sufficient to delaminate the weakest 2D-sapphire interface (1618). Successful release of the entire WS2 film left pristine WS2 layers at the bottom. The bottom WS2 layer was continuous and smooth with root mean square (RMS) roughness of 0.5 nm (an average value measured from 15 locations) (Fig. 1G) that resulted from complete merging of the nuclei of the initial layers.

To harvest the continuous WS2 monolayer, we deposited a Ni layer on the bottom of the WS2 film while retaining the top tape/Ni/WS2 stack as exfoliated (Fig. 1A). In a manner similar to the act of peeling the Ni/WS2 stack off of the sapphire substrate, we applied a moment from the top Ni to initiate spalling mode fracture for guiding the cracks downward. Because Γ2D-Ni is substantially higher than Γ2D-2D, the cracks arriving near the bottom Ni propagated through the weaker WS2-WS2 interface directly above the bottom Ni layer (Fig. 1C). Thus, the Ni/WS2 stack separated upon peeling, whereas the bottom Ni strongly adhered to the WS2 monolayer, which left a monolayer of WS2 on the bottom Ni layer.

We transferred this monolayer film onto an 20.3-cm Si wafer coated with 90 nm of SiO2 to investigate the thickness and quality of the exfoliated monolayer WS2 film (see fig. S4 for photographs of the entire LRS process). As shown in Fig. 2, A and B, the 5-cm wafer-scale WS2 was transferred intact onto the 20.3-cm SiO2/Si wafer without prominent wrinkle, folding, or ripple. The average thickness of the transferred WS2 is 0.7 nm (average value obtained from scans on 10 locations) (Fig. 2C). The exact value for the monolayer is 0.616 nm (19), and we speculate that the greater observed thickness arose from tip-sample interactions under noncontact measurement mode. Successful isolation of the WS2 monolayer was confirmed by the substantial enhancement of the peak intensity of the PL spectra (Fig. 2D) at its direct gap of 1.99 eV, as compared with the weak and wide PL characteristic of a thick WS2 layer at its indirect gap of 1.97 eV (2025). Also, the PL intensity was not further degraded (fig. S5), implying that WS2 was already degraded before the process, given the prolonged time period after growth, which is typically observed in TMDCs after air exposure (26). Moreover, the strong PL intensity originating from the monolayer isolation was uniform across the entire 5-cm wafer area (spatial resolution of 2 mm) (Fig. 2E). PL mapping with greater spatial resolution further confirmed uniform monolayer thickness obtained by LRS (see Fig. 2F for a 50-μm resolution map on a 1-mm–by–1-mm area and fig. S6 for 1-μm resolution maps on 20-μm–by–20-μm area). Wafer-scale monolayer thickness was also confirmed by mapping the PL peak position where peaks are all concentrated at its direct gap of 1.99 eV (fig. S7) (2025).

Fig. 2 Wafer-scale monolayer 2D material obtained by LRS process.

(A) Optical image of 5-cm wafer-scale WS2 monolayer on 20.3-cm oxidized Si wafer obtained through the LRS process. (B) Macrograph of 5-cm wafer-scale WS2 monolayer. (C) AFM image and height profile of the WS2 monolayer transferred on SiO2/Si wafer. Scale bar: 1 μm. (D) Representative PL spectra of as-exfoliated 4-nm-thick WS2 (blue line) and monolayer WS2 obtained by LRS process (red line), in which the PL spectrum for 4-nm-thick WS2 is multiplied by a factor of 10 to show the clear peak position. (E) Wafer-scale PL mapping image at 1.99 eV of WS2 on the SiO2/Si wafer, where the spatial resolution is 2 mm. (F) Large-scale (1 mm by 1 mm) PL intensity map from 1.99 eV for WS2 on SiO2, where the spatial resolution is 50 μm (see fig. S6 for 1-μm resolution map). All PL spectra were taken at the same laser power (2 mW) and wavelength (532 nm).

All LRS WS2 films were transferred with a quasi-dry process, in which the WS2 split from the multilayers was directly dry-bonded to the SiO2-coated Si wafer, followed by etching to remove the Ni (16, 17, 27). The average RMS roughness was 0.5 nm after LRS measured from 15 different spots in each material (see fig. S8). We speculate that perfect atomic smoothness (RMS < 0.3 nm) was not obtained because of the polycrystalline nature of the films with a grain size of ~60 nm (fig. S9). Larger-scale morphological inspection of monolayer 2D materials after LRS with Raman microscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy revealed no prominent surface defects and macroscopic deformation such as wrinkle, folding, or ripple (figs. S10 and S11). More importantly, LRS did not substantially degrade electrical quality of the 2D materials. The average Hall mobility measured from few layers before LRS was 106.8 cm2 V−1 s−1 compared with 89.5 cm2 V−1 s−1 for the monolayer after LRS (fig. S12) (28).

The LRS process was repeated to harvest additional continuous monolayers until the split layer was no longer continuous. In parallel, an entire 4-nm-thick WS2 film was transferred from another sapphire substrate onto a 90-nm-thick SiO2-coated Si wafer as a reference. Optical micrographs and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show the split layer’s nonuniform thickness (Fig. 3, A and B). Repetition of LRS yielded continuous production of uniform continuous monolayer WS2 (see fig. S13 for Raman spectra showing rightward shift of the E12g peak compared with that of as-exfoliated 4-nm-thick WS2 films) through three cycles (Fig. 3, C to H). After the third cycle, residual WS2 was observed as discontinuous triangle domains on the top Ni film (Fig. 3, I and J), indicating that the LRS process has reached the final top layer where nucleated islands failed to merge during growth. Furthermore, we measured strong direct-gap emission peaks (at 1.99 eV) only from the WS2 obtained through the first three cycles (Fig. 3K).

Fig. 3 Split of thick 2D materials into many monolayers via LRS process and their characterization.

(A, C, E, G, and I) Optical micrographs and (B, D, F, H, and J) plan-view SEM images for as-exfoliated thick WS2 [(A) and (B)] and monolayers of WS2 obtained by the first [(C) and (D)], second [(E) and (F)], third [(G) and (H)], and last [(I) and (J)] LRS processes, respectively. The monolayers are all transferred on 90-nm-thick SiO2/Si substrates. (K) Representative PL spectra for as-exfoliated thick WS2 (black line) multiplied by a factor of 10 to show the clear peak position, as well as monolayers of WS2 obtained by the first (red line), second (green line), and third (blue line) LRS processes. All PL spectra were taken at the same laser power (2 mW) and wavelength (532 nm). Scale bars for optical microscopy images and plan-view SEM images are 50 μm and 400 nm, respectively.

We applied our LRS technique to other 2D materials, including MoSe2, WSe2, MoS2, and h-BN, and confirmed successful monolayer splitting for all. As shown in fig. S14, 3-nm-thick h-BN grown on sapphire was split into three h-BN monolayers. In addition, as shown in fig. S15, monolayer isolation of MoSe2, WSe2, and MoS2 after LRS was confirmed by PL measurement (see also figs. S16 to S18 for optical microscope images and Raman spectra of MoSe2, WSe2, and MoS2 before and after the LRS process). We also characterized these monolayers with AFM, confocal Raman microscopy, and laser scanning confocal microscopy (figs. S8, S10, and S11).

We then fabricated various 2D heterostructures. First, we fabricated WS2/h-BN heterostructures with the monolayer WS2 sandwiched between h-BNs to investigate the effect of wafer-scale encapsulation of TMDCs. Reduction of carrier scattering by a surface optical phonon has been observed in the flakes of h-BN/TMDC/h-BN heterostructures (29). Wafer-scale h-BN/TMDC/h-BN heterostructures were fabricated with LRS together with the quasi-dry transfer process. Monolayer h-BN prepared by LRS was transferred twice on a SiO2/Si wafer, followed by monolayer transfer of WS2 on top, and capped by transferring h-BN twice for encapsulation (see fig. S19 for the schematic description of 2D heterostructure via LRS process). We observed a substantial enhancement of PL intensity uniformly across the wafer (1-mm–by–1-mm PL map shown in Fig. 4A and measured across the wafer with same PL results), as compared with that of a WS2 monolayer quasi-dry transferred on SiO2 (see Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4 Wafer-scale 2D heterostructures.

PL mapping images at 1.99 eV of (A) a double-layer (2 ML) h-BN/monolayer (1 ML) WS2/2 ML h-BN heterostructure fabricated by quasi-dry stacking, (B) 1 ML WS2 on SiO2 made by quasi-dry transfer, (C) a 2 ML h-BN/1 ML WS2/2 ML h-BN heterostructure formed by wet stacking, and (D) 1 ML WS2 on SiO2 made by wet stacking. (E) Representative PL spectra of all different structures fabricated by different methods. All PL spectra were taken at the same laser power (2 mW) and wavelength (532 nm). (F) Schematic of a MoS2-based field effect transistor (FFT). (G) Macrograph of 10-by-10 FET arrays integrated on a SiO2/Si wafer with 1-cm–by–1-cm size. Inset shows micrograph of an individual device. Scale bar: 100 μm. The device area is defined by the gap between source (S) and drain (D) electrodes. G, gate. (H) Representative drain current–gate voltage (IDVG) characteristics of MoS2-based FETs at drain voltage (VDS) = 1 V. (I) 2D color maps of hysteresis voltage extracted from IDVG curves at VDS = 1 V in transistor arrays made without h-BN (left) and with h-BN (right).

When we fabricated h-BN/WS2/h-BN heterostructures by using a wet stacking process in which 2D materials were scooped from a solution (see materials and methods for details of the wet stacking process), we observed a substantially weakened PL response compared to that of heterostructures prepared by the quasi-dry stacking process (Fig. 4C), which were attributed to interference coming from poly(methyl methacrylate) residues at the interface (fig. S20). Representative PL spectra for monolayer WS2 on SiO2 and double-layer h-BN/monolayer WS2/double-layer h-BN prepared by quasi-dry and wet stacking are shown in Fig. 4E. Substantial degradation of the PL intensity was observed for the wet-stacked h-BN/WS2 heterostructure even compared with quasi-dry transferred WS2 on SiO2. A 15-fold enhancement of PL intensity was observed for h-BN/WS2/h-BN quasi-dry stacks compared with that for WS2 wet stacks on SiO2 (Fig. 4D).

Our study revealed wafer-scale enhancement in optoelectronic quality of monolayer WS2 by wafer-scale h-BN encapsulation that should permit fabrication of large-scale optoelectronic devices based on vdW heterostructures. Our quasi-dry stacking method is the key to achieving optoelectronic enhancement in TMDCs by h-BN encapsulation, as the process preserves the quality of the 2D materials. The optical quality of the TMDCs was not severely affected, although the roughness of the surface slightly increases with increasing layer numbers in the heterostructures (fig. S21), possibly because of the presence of nanometer-scale Ni residues after the quasi-dry stacking process (17).

We also fabricated arrays of 2D heterostructure devices at the wafer scale. These heterostructure arrays exhibited uniformly enhanced device performance across the wafer. LRS-fabricated MoS2 and h-BN multilayers were quasi-dry stacked on a SiO2/Si wafer to form field effect transistors (FETs). Deleterious trap charges from the substrate were avoided by using h-BN (see Fig. 4F for the structure of our 2D heterostructure device) (3032). Figure 4G shows an optical image of the 10-by-10 arrays of MoS2 FETs on a 1-cm2 wafer. Although FETs both with and without h-BN exhibited high on-off ratios of >107 (fig. S22), the FETs without h-BN display very large hysteresis in their drain current–gate voltage sweep, which is detrimental to their transistor operation. However, substantial suppression of hysteresis has been observed in FETs with h-BN (Fig. 4H). This reduction of hysteresis was obtained uniformly across the arrays in the wafer. As shown in the map of hysteresis of FETs with and without h-BN, the FET arrays with h-BN showed excellent reduction in hysteresis during a gate voltage sweep applied uniformly across the wafer (Fig. 4I).

The merit of the quasi-dry stacking process was also highlighted by fabricating arrays of WSe2/graphene vertical transistors (see fig. S23 for an optical image of the 8-by-8 arrays of WSe2/graphene vertical transistors made on a 1-cm–by–1-cm wafer). As shown in the map of on-off ratios of vertical transistors (fig. S23), our transistor arrays formed by quasi-dry stacking showed excellent device-to-device uniformity with 9.6% variation (see fig. S24 for the statistical distribution). Vertical transistor arrays fabricated by the wet-stacking process had a device-to-device variation of 26%.

We have demonstrated that the LRS technique can precisely isolate monolayers of 2D materials at the wafer scale from multilayers of 2D materials, thus allowing wafer-scale integration of 2D materials. LRS permits high-throughput manufacturing of wafer-scale monolayers of various 2D materials from thick 2D material films grown at relaxed growth conditions. We have demonstrated various 2D heterostructure devices at the wafer by applying LRS together with quasi-dry stacking. These heterostructure devices exhibit uniform device performances across the wafer. This high-throughput manufacturing of 2D heterostructures will become the stepping stone for commercialization of 2D material-based devices.

Supplementary Materials

Materials and Methods

Figs. S1 to S24

References (33, 34)

References and Notes

Acknowledgments: Funding: J.K. acknowledges support from NSF grant no. CMMI-1825731. K.L. acknowledges support from NSF grant no. CMMI-1825256. A.O., S.S., and X.L. acknowledge the French National Research Agency for the cofunding of the h-BN study under the “GANEX” Laboratory of Excellence “LABEX” project. D.N. acknowledges the MIT Lincoln Laboratory Technology Office and Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering for funding the growth of wafer-scale WS2 films. J.M. acknowledge support from NSF grant no. DMR-1700137, ONR grant no. N00014-16-1-2657, and the STC Center for Integrated Quantum Materials under NSF grant no. DMR-1231319. Distribution statement A: Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. This material is based on work supported by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering under Air Force contract no. FA8721-05-C-0002 and/or FA8702-15-D-0001. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. G.Z. and C.H. acknowledge that this work was supported in part by NEWLIMITS, a center in nCORE, a Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) program sponsored by NIST through award no. 70NANB17H041. J.K. thanks J.-H. Park of SKKU for fruitful discussion and support. J.K. acknowledges the MIT-MI one-on-one project for partial support. Author contributions: J.S., S.-H.B., W.K., and D.L. contributed equally to this work. J.K. conceived the idea, designed experiments, and directed the team. J.S., S.-H.B., W.K., D.L., K.Q., H.Y., C.C., H.K., and K.L. performed fabrication and characterization of all samples and wrote the manuscript. R.Z., Y.O., J.M., and X.Z. contributed to the computational model. D.N. worked on the growth of WS2 on sapphire. S.S., X.L., and A.O. worked on the growth of h-BN on sapphire. R.Y., G.Z., and C.H. worked on the growth of WSe2 on sapphire. J.-H.A., and Y.J.P. worked on the growth of MoS2 on sapphire and transistor devices. All authors contributed to the discussion and analysis of the results. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions of this study are present in the paper or the supplementary materials.
View Abstract

Stay Connected to Science


Navigate This Article