In DepthCriminal Justice

Researchers probe jail before trial

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  29 Mar 2019:
Vol. 363, Issue 6434, pp. 1374-1375
DOI: 10.1126/science.363.6434.1374

You are currently viewing the summary.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution

Summary

Cities and states across the United States have started to move to ease cash bail and other pretrial detention policies that critics say are unfair, counterproductive, and contribute little to public safety. But the reforms—backed by liberal and libertarian groups alike—have drawn stiff opposition from some law enforcement organizations and the bail bond industry. Relatively little hard evidence informs the battle. Now, a new wave of social scientists is jumping into the breach, using controlled studies to find out which practices result in higher court appearance rates—and which ones actually keep communities safe. Recent results suggest, for example, that jailing defendants before trial, unless they pay a deposit known as cash bail, is ineffective, at least in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. But such research is hard to apply widely, and scientists face other obstacles, including police, prosecutors, and prisons reluctant to share data.