In DepthScience & Security

NIH reveals its formula for tracking foreign influences

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  04 Oct 2019:
Vol. 366, Issue 6461, pp. 19-20
DOI: 10.1126/science.366.6461.19

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • RE: NIH and Foreign Influences

    This disturbing account of NIH investigations focused on Chinese-American scientists strongly suggests this effort is based on a fundamental misconception. While individuals violating the confidentiality of grant application review or not disclosing support appropriately deserve sanctions, Mervis’ account indicates the primary goal of these investigations is not to safeguard grant application review but rather to inhibit the development of Chinese research capacity. As implied by the quoted remarks from Dr. Michael Lauer, NIH Deputy Director for Extramural Research, this is overwhelmingly basic and/or preclinical research. Attempts to restrict this type of work to the United States reflects a major category error. As also implied by Dr. Lauer’s remarks, this kind of research is unlikely to have any near-term commercial value, and very little is likely to lead to useful commercial products. This type of research is a non-excludable, non-rivalrous public good. Everyone benefits from good quality basic-preclinical research, regardless of whether it is performed in Bethesda or Beijing.
    Dr. Lauer is also quoted as expressing concern about “shadow labs,” ostensible Chinese efforts to duplicate NIH sponsored research. Given the relatively poor reproducibility of major findings in biomedical research, this doesn’t seem like a bad development. Indeed, it is more likely that efforts at reduplication will lead to discovery of false positive results than any commercial p...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.