Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  26 Jun 2020:
Vol. 368, Issue 6498, pp. 1481-1486
DOI: 10.1126/science.abb8001

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

  • RE: Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China
    • Allan Geliebter, Distinguished Professor, Touro College & University System; New York Medical College
    • Other Contributors:
      • Barbara T Rumain, Associate Professor, Touro College & University System; New York Medical College
      • Moshe Schneiderman, SUNY Downstate College of Medicine

    The press has been widely reporting a key finding based on Zhang et al. (Science 10.1126/science.abb8001(2020)) that children were less likely to become infected with COVID-19. In the Zhang et al. article, the children, ages 0-14 years, reported by the Hunan CDC to be infected in the Hunan province was 6.2% as compared to 8.6% among those 15-64 years and 16.3% among those 65 years and above. Zhang et al. obtained significant values of p <0.0001 for the comparison of children (0-14 years) to the reference group (15-64 years) and p =0.005 for the comparison of the older group (> 65 years) to the reference group.
    It does not seem plausible that a comparison between 6.2% to 8.6% would be much more significant than a comparison between 16.3% to 8.6%. We repeated the statistical comparisons using a chi-square test (with Yates correction for a 2 x 2 table), to obtain p = 0.033 (which is not significant based on two-tailed α = .025 after Bonferroni correction for 2 multiple tests) for the children vs. reference group and a highly significant p<0.0001 for the comparison between the 15-64 group and the >65 group. Zhang et al. used generalized linear mixed regression with several covariates, which we could not perform without having their data. However, it is improbable that their p values would appear so different and in the opposite direction from ours.
    Our statistical finding that children’s infection rate is not significantly lower than that of adults,...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Stay Connected to Science

Navigate This Article